Sometimes Late Is Better Than Never: Implantation of a Cardioverter Defibrillator Years after an Acute Myocardial Infarction - Case Report

Sustained ventricular arrhythmias that occur early post-myocardial infarction (MI) are generally considered epiphenomena of the MI and are not consistently associated with long-term prognosis. The lack of association with long-term prognosis is more clearly established for early ventricular fibrillation (VF) and polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PVT). Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT), even when it occurs early, however, may reflect a permanent arrhythmic substrate1. Patients with COVID-19 have a high risk of thromboembolic events, and the virus has also been shown to have extensive effects on the cardiovascular system2,3,4. A 62-year-old woman, recently hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia, was brought to the emergency department with pulseless SMVT having been successfully resuscitated in the prehospital setting. The patient has a history of an old MI treated with thrombolysis and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) that was complicated with early SMVT, but with preserved left ventricular function and without heart failure. The patient underwent implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). During the hospitalization, she developed dyspnea and was diagnosed with minor pulmonary embolism. It may be appropriate to consider early SMVT as a predictor of adverse late outcomes that would necessitate rigorous follow-up and maybe an early invasive primary prevention strategy. This case also reflects the possibility of long-term cardiac involvement and increased thromboembolic risk in patients recovering from COVID-19. © 2022 Maria Zamfirescu et al., published by Sciendo.

Characteristics of cardiotocography in pregnant women with mild COVID-19 in the third trimester.

Objective. To study the characteristics of cardiotocography (CTG) and pregnancy outcomes in patients who had a mild coronavirus infection in the third trimester. Patients and methods. The parameters and variations of CTG and pregnancy outcomes were analyzed in 32 low-risk pregnant women who experienced mild COVID-19 in the third trimester (the study group) and in 30 pregnant women (matched pairs) who had no coronavirus infection (the comparison group). Results. A total of 375 CTGs were analyzed: 221 in the study group and 154 in the comparison group. Normal CTG recordings were found in 87% of pregnant women in the study group, which was significantly less frequent than in those without COVID-19 (97%) (p = 0.02), and suspicious CTG in 10 and 1.3%, respectively, which was 3.38-fold more frequent than in the comparison group (p = 0.04). Pathological CTG recordings were observed only in two women in the study group. The features of CTG in women who had a mild form of COVID-19 in the third trimester were a significant decrease in the number of accelerations, short-term variation (STV) in the range of 3 to 5 ms, long-term variation (LTV) <50 ms, a tendency toward tachycardia and low heart rate variability (<5 ms), and prolonged decelerations. The frequency of fetal asphyxia and neonatal morbidity was higher in the study group. Conclusion. COVID-19 even in its mild form may have a negative effect on the fetus, increasing the frequency of fetal hypoxia and neonatal asphyxia.Copyright © 2023, Dynasty Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Acute or chronic? Failing left ventricle in a 34 year old

Submission content Introduction: An unusual case of a very young patient without previously known cardiac disease presenting with severe left ventricular failure, detected by a point of care echocardiogram. Main Body: A 34 year old previously well man was brought to hospital after seeing his general practitioner with one month of progressive shortness of breath on exertion. This began around the time the patient received his second covid-19 vaccination. He was sleeping in a chair as he was unable to lie flat. Abnormal observations led the GP to call an ambulance. In the emergency department, the patient required oxygen 5L/min to maintain SpO2 >94%, but he was not in respiratory distress at rest. Blood pressure was 92/53mmHg, mean 67mmHg. Point of care testing for COVID-19 was negative. He was alert, with warm peripheries. Lactate was 1.0mmol/L and he was producing more than 0.5ml/kg/hr of urine. There was no ankle swelling. ECG showed sinus tachycardia. He underwent CT pulmonary angiography which demonstrated no pulmonary embolus, but there was bilateral pulmonary edema. Troponin was 17ng/l, BNP was 2700pg/ml. Furosemide 40mg was given intravenously by the general medical team. Critical care outreach asked for an urgent intensivist review given the highly unusual diagnosis of pulmonary edema in a man of this age. An immediate FUSIC Heart scan identified a dilated left ventricle with end diastolic diameter 7cm and severe global systolic impairment. The right ventricle was not severely impaired, with TAPSE 18mm. There was no significant pericardial effusion. Multiple B lines and trace pulmonary effusions were identified at the lung bases. The patient was urgently discussed with the regional cardiac unit in case of further deterioration, basic images were shared via a cloud system. A potential diagnosis of vaccination-associated myocarditis was considered,1 but in view of the low troponin, the presentation was felt most likely to represent decompensated chronic dilated cardiomyopathy. The patient disclosed a family history of early cardiac death in males. Aggressive diuresis was commenced. The patient was admitted to a monitored bed given the potential risk of arrhythmia or further haemodynamic deterioration. Advice was given that in the event of worsening hypotension, fluids should not be administered but the cardiac centre should be contacted immediately. Formal echocardiography confirmed the POCUS findings, with ejection fraction <35%. He was initiated on ACE inhibitors and beta adrenergic blockade. His symptoms improved and he was able to return home and to work, and is currently undergoing further investigations to establish the etiology of his condition. Conclusion(s): Early echocardiography provided early evidence of a cardiac cause for the patient's presentation and highlighted the severity of the underlying pathology. This directed early aggressive diuresis and safety-netting by virtue of discussion with a tertiary cardiac centre whilst it was established whether this was an acute or decompensated chronic pathology. Ultrasound findings: PLAX, PSAX and A4Ch views demonstrating a severely dilated (7cm end diastolic diameter) left ventricle with global severe systolic impairment.

SAFETY OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS (PTS) WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (RA) TREATED WITH FILGOTINIB (FIL) IN FILOSOPHY: INTERIM RESULTS FROM A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

BackgroundConsideration is needed when using Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors to treat RA in pts aged ≥65 years or those with cardiovascular (CV) risk factors. The JAK1 preferential inhibitor FIL was generally well tolerated in clinical trials[1];safety has not been determined in a real-world setting.ObjectivesTo report baseline characteristics and up to 6-month safety data from the first 480 pts treated with FIL in the FILOSOPHY study (NCT04871919), and in two mutually exclusive subgroups based on age and CV risk.MethodsFILOSOPHY is an ongoing, phase 4, non-interventional, European study of pts with RA who have been prescribed FIL for the first time and in accordance with the product label in daily practice. Baseline characteristics and the incidence of select adverse events (AEs) are assessed in pts aged ≥65 years and/or with ≥1 CV risk factor (Table 1), and in those aged <65 years with no CV risk factors.ResultsAs of the end of June 2022, 480 pts had been treated: 441 received FIL 200 mg and 39 received FIL 100 mg. Of the 480 pts, 148 (30.8%) were aged ≥65 years;332 (69.2%) were aged <65 years. In total, 86 (17.9%) were former smokers, 81 (16.9%) were current smokers and 203 (42.3%) were non-smokers (data were missing for 110 pts [22.9%]). In addition to smoking, the most frequent CV risk factors included a history of hypertension (32.3%), a history of dyslipidemia (10.2%) and a family history of myocardial infarction (8.5%;Table 1).23 pts (4.8%) discontinued treatment due to AEs. Of the 354 pts aged ≥65 years or with ≥1 CV risk factor, infections affected 64 pts (18.1%), 34 (9.6%) had COVID-19, 2 (0.6%) had herpes zoster, and cardiac disorders (angina pectoris, atrial fibrillation, palpitations and tachycardia) affected 5 pts (1.4%);no cases of malignancies were observed. In the subgroup aged <65 years and with no CV risk factors (n=126), infections occurred in 18 pts (14.3%) (9 [7.1%] had COVID-19;3 [2.4%] had herpes zoster) and malignancies (myeloproliferative neoplasm) affected 1 pt (0.8%);no pts had cardiac disorders. There were no cases of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism in either subgroup.ConclusionIn this interim analysis of FILOSOPHY, no unexpected safety signals emerged at up to 6 months. Although infections and cardiac disorders affected a numerically greater proportion of pts aged ≥65 years or with ≥1 CV risk vs those aged <65 years with no CV risk, longer follow-up on a broader cohort is necessary to further characterize the safety of FIL in different groups of pts with RA.Reference[1]Winthrop K, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2022;81:184–92Table 1.Baseline characteristics and CV risk factorsBaseline demographics/CV risk factorsAll FIL-treated pts (N=480)≥65 years or with ≥1 CV risk factor (n=354)<65 years and no CV risk factor (n=126)*Female sex, n (%)351 (73.1)252 (71.2)99 (78.6)Age, years, mean (SD)57.6 (11.5)60.4 (10.8)49.6 (9.6)Rheumatoid factor positive, n (%)†228 (47.5)167 (47.2)61 (48.4)Anti-citrullinated protein antibody positive, n (%)‡243 (50.6)176 (49.7)67 (53. 2)Body mass index, kg/m2, mean (SD)27.6 (5.7) n=43728.0 (5.4) n=33126.3 (6.4) n=106RA disease duration, years, mean (SD)10.4 (9.4) n=47810.5 (9.5) n=35310.0 (8.8) n=125Tender joint count 28, mean (SD)8.6 (6.9) n=4578.7 (7.1) n=3408.3 (6.3) n=117Swollen joint count 28, mean (SD)5.6 (5.2) n=4525.7 (5.4) n=3365.4 (4.4) n=116Former smoker, n (%)§86 (17.9)86 (24.3)0Current smoker, n (%)§81 (16.9)81 (22.9)0Non-smoker, n (%)§203 (42.3)130 (36.7)73 (57.9)Family history of myocardial infarction, n (%)41 (8.5)41 (11.6)0Medical history of: n (%) CV disease33 (6.9)33 (9.3)0 Diabetes35 (7.3)35 (9.9)0 Dyslipidemia49 (10.2)49 (13.8)0 Hypertension155 (32.3)155 (43.8)0 Ischemic CNS  vascular disorders11 (2.3)11 (3.1)0 Peripheral vascular disease17 (3.5)17 (4.8)0*Includes 53 pts with missing smoking status data who were aged <65 years with no other CV risk factors.†Missing/unknown in 154 pts;‡Missing in 153 pts;§Smoking status data missing in 110 pts (22.9%).AcknowledgementsWe thank the physicia s and patients who participated in this study. The study was funded by Galapagos NV, Mechelen, Belgium. Publication coordination was provided by Fabien Debailleul, PhD, of Galapagos NV. Medical writing support was provided by Debbie Sherwood, BSc, CMPP (Aspire Scientific, Bollington, UK), and funded by Galapagos NV.Disclosure of InterestsPatrick Verschueren Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Roularta, Consultant of: Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Nordic Pharma, Sidekick Health, Grant/research support from: Galapagos, Pfizer, Jérôme Avouac Speakers bureau: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: BMS, Fresenius Kabi, Novartis, Pfizer, Karen Bevers Grant/research support from: Galapagos, Susana Romero-Yuste Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Biogen, BMS, Lilly, Pfizer, Consultant of: Sanofi, Lilly, Grant/research support from: Lilly, MSD, Roberto Caporali Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Thomas Debray Consultant of: Biogen, Galapagos, Gilead, Francesco De Leonardis Employee of: Galapagos, James Galloway Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Medicago, Novavax, Pfizer, Monia Zignani Shareholder of: Galapagos, Employee of: Galapagos, Gerd Rüdiger Burmester Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Chugai, Galapagos, Lilly, Pfizer, Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Galapagos, Lilly, Pfizer, Sanofi.

Concomitant hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome and COVID-19.

Udmurt Republic is an endemic region for hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS). An extremely high incidence of COVID-19 in 2020-2021 worldwide and in Udmurt Republic in particular suggests that patients might bear these two infections simultaneously. In this article, we report a case of mixed COVID-19 plus HFRS infection. Specific clinical manifestations of HFRS in a COVID-19-coinfected patient included long-term fatigue, thrombocytopenia, iso(hypo)sthenuria, polyuria, episodes of sinus tachycardia and hypertension. On the other hand, the main clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in a HFRS-coinfected patient included no clinical signs of respiratory failure and relatively high saturation despite a substantial lung damage. In general, mixed infection is a risk factor that aggravates the disease and can worsen outcome. However, simultaneous infection of a cell with more than one virus probably causes viral interference, which results in suppression of one or both viruses.Copyright © 2023, Dynasty Publishing House. All rights reserved.

PPP1R13L-Related Cardiomyopathy Stability Following IL1 Inhibition

Introduction: Variants in PPP1R13L are associated with severe childhood-onset cardiomyopathy resulting in rapid progression to death or cardiac transplantation. PPP1R13L is proposed to encode a protein that limits the transcriptional activity of the NFkappaB pathway leading to elevated IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-alpha production in murine models. Optimal medical management for PPP1R13L-related cardiomyopathy is unknown. Here we report usage of a targeted anti-IL-1 immuno-modulatory therapy resulting in cardiac stabilization in a pediatric patient with congenital cardiomyopathy secondary to PPP1R13L variants. Case Report: A 4-year-old boy presented acutely with fever in the setting of persistent abdominal pain, vomiting, fatigue, and decreased appetite for two months following a mild COVID-19 related illness. Echocardiogram revealed severely depressed biventricular systolic function with an ejection fraction of 30%. Due to acute decompensated heart failure symptoms with hemodynamic instability, he was intubated and placed on continuous inotropic infusions with aggressive diuresis. Cardiac MRI demonstrated extensive subepicardial to near transmural fibrosis by late gadolinium enhancement in right and left ventricles. An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was placed due to frequent runs of polymorphic non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. Testing for viral pathogens was positive for rhino/enterovirus. Initial genetic testing was non-diagnostic (82-gene cardiomyopathy panel) but given the patient's significant presentation whole genome sequencing was pursued that showed two separate PPP1R13L variants in trans (c.2167A>C,p.T723P and c.2179_2183del,p. G727Hfs*25, NM_006663.4). Patient serum cytokine testing revealed elevations in IL-10 (4.7 pg/mL) and IL-1beta (20.9 pg/mL). Given the patient's tenuous circumstances and concern for continued progression of his cardiac disease, a trial of IL-1 inhibition via anakinra dosed at 3 mg/kg or 45 mg daily was initiated following hospital discharge. With approximately 6 months of therapy, the patient's cardiac function is stable with normalization of IL-10 and IL-1beta serum levels. Notably, the ventricular arrhythmia decreased after initiation of anakinra with no ICD shocks given. Therapy overall has been well tolerated without infectious concerns. Conclusion(s): In patients with PPP1R13L-related cardiomyopathy, immuno-modulatory therapies should be considered in an attempt to slow cardiac disease progression.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc.

CARDIOVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS AFTER CORONAVIRUS DISEASE-2019

The data of the modern literature describing the long-term consequences of infection of the body with SARSCoV-2 on the cardiovascular system in the framework of postcovid syndrome are analyzed. To date, postcovid syndrome refers to a condition in which symptoms continue to persist for more than 12 weeks from the moment of diagnosis of COVID-19. Various complaints of patients after undergoing a new coronavirus infection are described, the distinguishing feature of which is their versatility, where cardiovascular manifestations are assigned one of the leading roles. Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, cardiac arrhythmia and conduction disorders are considered. The role of SARS-CoV-2 in the formation of de novo and decompensation of pre-existing cardiovascular diseases has been demonstrated. The possibility of developing heart failure in patients with COVID-19 as an outcome of inflammation of the heart muscle is shown. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the incidence of myocarditis after 3 months or more from the diagnosis of COVID-19, as well as thrombotic complications, in the genesis of which the main role belongs to the formation of endothelial dysfunction resulting from the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 with vascular endothelial cells. The autoimmune component of the pathogenesis of damage to the cardiovascular system as a result of the formation of endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19 is also considered. The authors present a laboratory-instrumental algorithm for determining cardiovascular complications in people who have undergone COVID-19, including the determination of the N-terminal fragment of the brain natriuretic peptide B-type prohormone, the level of anticardial antibodies, electrocardiography, echocardiography, as well as magnetic resonance imaging of the heart with contrast. All rights reserved © Eco-Vector, 2022.

SAFETY ANALYSIS OF JAKINIBS IN REAL CLINICAL PRACTICE IN A COHORT OF 116 PATIENTS

BackgroundJanus kinase inhibitors (JAKinibs) have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA), although their safety profile continues to be analysed due to the possible increase in adverse events (AEs) in relation to anti-TNFs (mild and severe infections, haematological alterations, thromboembolism, increase in neoplasms).ObjectivesTo evaluate in real clinical practice the AEs of JAKinibs in a cohort of patients with RA and SpA. In addition, adherence and reasons for discontinuation (1st or 2nd failure, AE) are analysed.MethodsObservational study of 116 patients diagnosed with RA or SpA who received treatment with JAKinibis (tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib) after failure of treatment with different classical synthetic (FAMEsc) or biological (FAMEb) disease-modifying drugs. The following data were analysed: demographic characteristics of the patients, years of disease progression, 1st or 2nd failures and AE.ResultsMean age was 52 years, with Baricitinib being older (60 years -SD 13.6), higher prevalence of females in all groups, and a disease progression time of about 10 years. Mean number of FAMEsc was 1.6 and mean number of FAMEb was 2,3 to Tofacitinib(Tofa), 2,76 to Baricitinib(Bari) and 4,4 to Upadacitinib(Upa). 71 (63%) patients had active corticosteroid therapy. The median treatment time with Tofa was 8.8 months, Bari 9.5 and Upa 2.4 months.Most frequent AEs with Tofa were urinary tract infections(UTI) (11.9%, 7 cases) and headaches (8.47%, 5 cases). There were 3 cases of herpes zoster (5.1%), one of which was recurrent, and 2 cases respectively of tachycardia and gastrointestinal intolerance (3.4%). With Baricitnib, 2(5%) cases of UTI and 2(5%) of influenza A were reported. Most frequent AEs related to Upadacitinb are gastrointestinal intolerance, labialis and facial herpes, anterior uveitis and recurrent UTI, with 1 case for each adverse event. There were 4 success with Baricitinib treatment: 2 due to severe COVID, 1 influenza A and 1 due to stroke. 17 patients had 1st failure to Tofa(28.81%), 8 to Bari20.0%) and 3 to Upa(18.75%);7(11.86%) and 2(5%) patients had 2nd failure to Tofa and Bari respectively, no with Upa.Mean CRP to Tofa-SD 18.9-was 17.19, 20-SD 22.7- to Bari and 24.2-SD 27.40- to Upa. Mean ESR-SD 15.3- was 25.4, -SD 26.4 and 44.3 -SD 32-, respectively. At 6 months, 36(62%) were continuing on Tofa, 22(56%) on Bari and 4(27%) on Upa. At 12 months, 27(46.6%) were still on Tofa and 12 on Bari(30.8%) and no patients were on upa.Table 1.TofaBariUpaMean age496047Male19%18%20%Female81%82%80%Time course of disease(years)81111Permanence 6 months62%56%27%Permanence 12 months46,6%31%0%Patients with corticotherapy62%64%60%Previous biological drugs2,3 SD 22,8 SD 2,34,4 SD 2,9Patients who discontinued the drug62%59%33%Mean CRP at the end of treatment172024Mean end-of-treatment ESR252644Repeated AEsUTI(7) Headache(5) Shingles(3) Nephritic colic(2) Gastrointestinal intolerance(2) Tachycardia(2)UTI(4) Headache(2)Serious AEsShingles (3)Varicella encephalopathy(1) Stroke(1) Shingles (1)1st failure28,8%20%18,7%2nd failure11,9%5%0%SuccessSARS-Cov2(2) Influenza(1) Stroke(1)Figure 1. Months stay pharmacoConclusionMost frequent adverse events with JAKinibs are mild infections, except gastrointestinal complaints with upadacitinib. Serious adverse events, including 3 deaths from viral infections, were observed, mostly in patients over 65 years. Most frequent cause of discontinuation was treatment failure. We believe that further observational studies are needed to stratify and profile the risk of infection with JAKinibs.References[1]Atzeni F, Popa CD, et al. Safety of JAK inhibitors: focus on cardiovascular and thromboembolic events. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2022 Mar;18(3):233-244. Doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2022.2039630 Epub 2022 Feb 17.PMID: 35129033[2]Alves C, Penedones A,et al. The Risk of Infections Associated With JAK Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Mar 1;28(2):e407-e414 PMID:33902098Ackn wledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

Vital sign deviations in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: An observational study with continuous monitoring

Background: The purpose was to determine the frequency and duration of vital sign deviations in acutely admitted patients in general wards with confirmed COVID-19 infection using continuous wireless vital sign monitoring. Material(s) and Method(s): Patients were equipped with two wireless sensors live-transmitting respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2). Frequency and duration of vital sign deviations were compared with manual point measurements performed by clinical staff according to the national Early Warning Score (EWS), assuming linear relationship between EWS point measurements. Result(s): Continuous monitoring detected episodes of SpO2 < 92% for more than 60 consecutive min in 92% of patients versus 42% of patients detected by EWS (p < 0.0001). Events of desaturation with SpO2 < 88% for more than 10 min was registered in 87% with continuous monitoring versus 27% with EWS (p < 0.0001). Desaturation with SpO2 < 80% for more than 1 min was detected in 76% with continuous monitoring versus 6% with EWS (p < 0.0001). 70% of patients had episodes of tachypnea with RR >24 breaths per minute >5 min detected with continuous monitoring versus 36% assessed by EWS (p = 0.0001). Episodes of HR >111 for >60 min was recorded in 51% versus 24% (p = 0.0002). Conclusion(s): Moderate and severe episodes of desaturation, tachypnea, and tachycardia during hospital admission in patients with COVID-19 infection are common and most often not detected by routine manual measurements.

ST-SEGMENT-ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION in COVID-19

Introduction: The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 have been associated with cardiovascular adverse events including acute myocardial infarction due to a prothrombotic and hypercoagulable status, and endothelial dysfunction. Case report: We report the case of a 62-year-old women, admitted to the hospital via the emergency room for acute chest pain and dyspnea. A nasopharyngeal swab was positive for COVID19 real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction 11 day ago. On admission, she was hypotensive with systolic blood pressure measering 87 mmHg and tachycardic with 117 beats/min, oxygen saturation (SO2) was 94%. An 18-lead ECG revealed an infero-postero-lateral ST-elevation myocardial infarction with right ventricular involvement and a seconddegree- Mobitz Type 1 atrioventricular block. The coronary angiography from the right femoral artery showed acute thrombotic occlusion of the first diagonal branch with TIMI 0 flow and acute thrombotic occlusion of proximal right coronary artery with TIMI 0 flow. The most likely diagnosis was myocardial infarction secondary to a non-atherosclerotic coronary occlusion. The angioplasy was performed with dilatations with a semi compliant balloon, bailout implant of BMS, manual thrombus aspiration and intracoronary injection of tirofiban in the right coronary artery. The myocardial revascularization was ineffective. The patient developed significant severe hemodynamic instability and cardiac arrest for pulseless electric activity after 24 hours. Conclusion(s): The COVID-19 outbreak implies deep changes in the clinical profile and therapeutic management of STEMI patients who underwent PCI. At present, the natural history of coronary embolism is not well understood;however, the cardiac mortality rate are hight. This suggests these patients require further study to identify the natural history of the condition and to optimize management to improve outcome.

Clinical observation of Suhexiang Pills in treatment of patients with tachycardia after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Objective To explore the clinical effect and safety of Suhexiang Pills () in the treatment of patients with tachycardia after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Methods A total of 138 patients with tachycardia after SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to eight hospitals such as 971st Hospital of the PLA Navy, Changzhou Second People's Hospital, Xuzhou First People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Chest Hospital from February 2023 to March 2023 were randomly divided into control group and treatment group, with 87 patients in the treatment group and 51 in the control group. Patients in the control group were po administered with betaloc, once a day, and the initial dose was 23.75 mg, adjusted in time according to the patient's heart rate. Patients in the treatment group were po administered with Suhexiang Pills, 1 pill/time, twice daily. Patients in two groups were treated for 7 d. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was observed, and the heart rate and cardiac function indexes, RR interval, blood oxygen saturation and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Results After treatment, the total effective rate of the treatment group was 98.85%, and the total effective rate of the control group was 90.20%, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After treatment, heart rates were significantly decreased in both groups (P < 0.05), and the heart rates of the treatment group were significantly better than those of the control group (P < 0.05) on the 7th day of treatment. After treatment, the level of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in both groups was significantly higher than that before treatment (P < 0.05), and there was statistical difference between the treatment group and the control group (P < 0.05). The levels of left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVEDD) and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) in the treatment group significantly decreased than that before treatment (P < 0.05), and there was no statistical difference compared with the control group (P > 0.05). After treatment, the maximum RR interval in both groups reached the normal range on the third day, and the treatment group was significantly better than the control group (P < 0.05). Blood oxygen saturation of the treatment group was significantly increased on the 7th day of treatment compared with before treatment (P < 0.05), but there was no statistical significance between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the total incidence of adverse events between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Suhexiang Pills decrease heart rates in patients with tachycardia after SARS-CoV-2 infection, which was equivalent to the effect of western medicine, and can protect heart, improve heart function to a certain extent.Copyright © 2023 Editorial Office of Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs. All rights reserved.

PERICARDITIS AFTER COVID-19 VACCINATION: A CASE SERIES

BackgroundCOVID-19 vaccination campaigns successfully impacted on viral spreading and in particular on clinical course of the disease. However, secondary to a highly extended vaccination program, several local and systemic adverse events associated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have been reported. Pericarditis and myocarditis are examples of cardiac complications related to these vaccines. In particular, cases of pericarditis have occurred after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (mostly secondary to vaccination with Moderna than Pfizer-BioNTech), especially in male adolescents and young adults, more often after the second dose. The incidence is approximately of 1-2 cases/100.000.ObjectivesAim of our study was to study the clinical profile of pericarditis occurred within 30 days after COVID-19 vaccines in our clinic.MethodsWe present a case series of patients who developed pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccination in the Department of Internal Medicine at Fatebenefratelli Hospital in Milan, followed from December 1, 2021 to April 15, 2022.ResultsTwenty-five individuals, of which 18 (72%) were women and 7 (28%) were males, had vaccine related pericarditis. Two patients were vaccinated with AstraZeneca, 2 with Moderna, the remaining with Pfizer-BioNTech. Median age was of 42 years. Of all patients, one subject was affected by constrictive effusive pericarditis, while another required treatment of pericarditis with Anakinra, switched to Canakinumab after severe skin reactions, because of failure of therapeutic response to first-line treatments.Two patients required hospital admission, in one case for a transient constrictive pericarditis. In the remaining cases clinical symptoms associated with post-vaccines pericarditis were mild and didn't require hospitalization.Chest pain was reported in 100% of cases, whereas pericardial effusion (in one case larger than 10 mm) was evidenced in 30% of subjects. Eighty percent of patients experienced tachycardia, whereas 90% reported asthenia.An increase in indices of inflammation (CRP) was documented in 50% of patients, usually mild.With regard to therapy, 90% of patients were treated with NSAIDs, 95% with colchicine, while 50% of cases required treatment with low-dose steroids.ConclusionCOVID-19 vaccination induces a particular form of pericarditis, often insidious and very troublesome, but with good prognosis. The clinical phenotype showed less typical chest pain, often normal indices of inflammation and little or no instrumental changes, but patients often experimented tachycardia and functional limitation. With regard to therapy, we used NSAIDs at adequate dosages to control the clinical condition, or low-dose colchicine. Low doses of cortisone (e.g., prednisone 5-10 mg a day) were useful in the presence of marked asthenia or systemic symptoms. Beta-blockers or ivabradine were used in the presence of tachycardia.References[1]Barda N, Children 2021, 8(7), 607;Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 in a Nationwide setting. N Engl J med 2021;385:1078-1090.[2]Diaz GA, Myocarditis and Pericarditis After Vaccination for COVID-19. JAMA 2021;326 (12): 1210-1212.[3]Bibhuti D, Myocarditis and Pericarditis Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination: What Do We Know So Far?. Children 2021, 8(7), 607.[4]Giacomo Maria Viani, Patrizia Pedrotti, Romano Seregni, and Brucato Antonio;Effusive–constrictive pericarditis after the second dose of BNT162b2 vaccine (Comirnaty): a case report;European Heart Journal - Case Reports (2022) 6(2), 1–6.[5]Francesco Perna, Elena Verecchia, Gaetano Pinnacchio, Laura Gerardino, Antonio Brucato, and Raffaele Manna;Rapid resolution of severe pericardial effusion using anakinra in a patient with COVID-19 vaccine-related acute pericarditis relapse:a case report;European Heart Journal - Case Reports (2022) 6, 1–6.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

Frequency of Supraventricular Arrhythmias in COVID.19 Patients: A Single.Center Study

Background: Cardiac arrhythias had a significant association with the increased mortality rate in COVID-19 patients in hospitals. The present study aimed to evaluate the frequency of supraventricular arrhythmias in COVID-19 patients and to assess the echocardiographic parameters and inflammatory biomarkers in COVID-19 patients who developed supraventricular arrhythmias. Method(s): This cross-sectional study enrolled 196 patients, 33 of them developed supraventricular arrhythmias during hospitalization in Zagazig University isolation hospital. Result(s): There was a statistically significant association between the occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and both oxygen saturation and lymphocyte percentage, which was significantly lower in those with AF. There was a statistically significant association between the occurrence of AF and CORADS, C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin-6, which were significantly higher in those with AF. Younger age and higher oxygen saturation decreased the risk of supraventricular tachycardia among the studied patients. Increasing oxygen saturation decreased the risk of AF among the studied patients, while higher CRP significantly increased risk by 1.045 folds. Conclusion(s): Atrial arrhythmias, especially with AF considered prevalent in cases with COVID-19. The atrial arrhythmias were correlated with higher cardiac injury and inflammatory markers and elevated severe COVID-19 clinical manifestations. Regarding mortality in-hospital, the association between COVID-19 and atrial arrhythmias was independent. 2023 Journal of Indian College of Cardiology.Copyright © 2023 Intervention, Journal of Mental Health and Psychosocial Support in Conflict Affected Areas.

Atrial electromechanical delay in post-COVID-19 postural orthostatic tachycardia: Innocent bystander or pathologic factor.

BACKGROUND: Post-COVID-19 syndrome represents a wide range of ongoing symptoms that persist beyond weeks or even months, after recovery from the acute phase. Postural orthostatic tachycardia (POT) is one of these symptoms with a poorly recognized underlying pathophysiology. PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate atrial electromechanical delay (AEMD), demonstrated by electrocardiographic P wave dispersion (PWD) and tissue Doppler echocardiography (TDE) in patients with POST-COVID-19 POT (PCPOT). METHODS: 94 post-COVID-19 patients were enrolled and classified into two groups; PCPOT group, 34 (36.1%) patients, and normal heart rate (NR group), 60 (63.9%) patients. 31.9% of them were males and 68.1% were females, with a mean age of 35 ± 9 years. Both groups were compared in terms of PWD and AEMD. RESULTS: As compared to the NR group, the PCPOT group showed a significant increase in PWD (49 ± 6 versus 25.6 ± 7.8, p < 0.001), higher CRP (37 ± 9 versus 30 ± 6, p = 0.04), prolonged left-atrial EMD, right-atrial EMD and inter-atrial EMD at (p = 0.006, 0.001, 0.002 respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that P wave dispersion (ß 0.505, CI (0.224-1.138), p = 0.023), PA lateral (ß 0.357, CI (0.214-0.697), p = 0.005), PA septal (ß 0.651, CI. (0.325-0.861), p = 0.021), and intra-left atrial EMD (ß 0.535, CI (0.353-1.346) p < 0.012) were independent predictors of PCPOT. CONCLUSION: Atrial heterogenicity in the form of prolonged AEMD and PWD seems to be a reasonable underlying pathophysiology of PCPOT. This could provide a new concern during the management and novel pharmacological approaches in these patients.

Female reproductive health impacts of Long COVID and associated illnesses including ME/CFS, POTS, and connective tissue disorders: a literature review.

Long COVID disproportionately affects premenopausal women, but relatively few studies have examined Long COVID's impact on female reproductive health. We conduct a review of the literature documenting the female reproductive health impacts of Long COVID which may include disruptions to the menstrual cycle, gonadal function, ovarian sufficiency, menopause, and fertility, as well as symptom exacerbation around menstruation. Given limited research, we also review the reproductive health impacts of overlapping and associated illnesses including myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), connective tissue disorders like Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), and endometriosis, as these illnesses may help to elucidate reproductive health conditions in Long COVID. These associated illnesses, whose patients are 70%-80% women, have increased rates of dysmenorrhea, amenorrhea, oligomenorrhea, dyspareunia, endometriosis, infertility, vulvodynia, intermenstrual bleeding, ovarian cysts, uterine fibroids and bleeding, pelvic congestion syndrome, gynecological surgeries, and adverse pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia, maternal mortality, and premature birth. Additionally, in Long COVID and associated illnesses, symptoms can be impacted by the menstrual cycle, pregnancy, and menopause. We propose priorities for future research and reproductive healthcare in Long COVID based on a review of the literature. These include screening Long COVID patients for comorbid and associated conditions; studying the impacts of the menstrual cycle, pregnancy, and menopause on symptoms and illness progression; uncovering the role of sex differences and sex hormones in Long COVID and associated illnesses; and addressing historical research and healthcare inequities that have contributed to detrimental knowledge gaps for this patient population.

Diagnostic accuracy of sinus tachycardia as an independent clinical indicator among different COVID-19 variants

Background. The most common arrhythmia which have been reported frequently in COVID-19 patients is sinus tachy-cardia. As COVID-19 is usually misdiagnosed with other respiratory tract diseases, introduction of a rapid clinical indicator for out of proportional sinus tachycardia in the diagnosis of COVID-19 during the early viral replication stage is essential for better cost-effective use of resources.Objectives. This study was conducted to determine the diagnostic accuracy of sinus tachycardia as an independent indicator of COVID-19.Material and methods. This is a cross-sectional analytical study. It included 152 healthcare workers who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the factors associated with COVID-19 among the entire study sample and among each group.Results. Among our participants, 32.9% were male, while 67.1% were female, with a mean age of 35.47 +/- 7.09 years. It was found that 51.3% of our sample were COVID-19 PCR positive, and the mean number of days of symptoms at presentation was 2.01 +/- 1.29. It was found that the prevalence of out of proportional sinus tachycardia among the participants diagnosed with COVID-19 in 2021 was triple that of the participants who were recruited in 2020 (61%, 26%, respectively). It was found that there was significant association between pulse rate and COVID-19, with gender, age, temperature or days of symptoms having no effect.Conclusions. The study highlights the diagnostic accuracy of sinus tachycardia as an independent indicator of COVID-19, especially the Omicron variant, as a higher pulse rate is associated with higher odds of having COVID-19

Impact of Covid-19 Infection on Baseline Autonomic Symptoms in Patients with Pre-Existing Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Orthostatic Intolerance

Background: Recently there have been several published case series of some survivors of COVID-19 infection left with chronic symptoms of autonomic dysfunction (AD) with features of orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). However, the impact of this viral illness on the underlying autonomic symptoms has not been studied in the patient population who have a pre-existing POTS diagnosis and are receiving treatment. Objective(s): So far, the impact of this viral illness on the underlying autonomic symptoms has not been studied in patients with a pre-existing POTS diagnosis and receiving treatment. Our study aims to report the impact of a COVID-19 infection on these patient populations, both during the acute phase of the disease and post-recovery. Method(s): Our Institution Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained to access charts of the study subjects. Basic demographic and diagnosis details including the age, sex, prominent symptoms, duration of POTS diagnosis, medications, associated autonomic disease, and medication regimen were obtained from the retrospective chart review. Additional information regarding COVID-19 infection, course of illness, need for hospitalization, worsening of POTS symptoms, need for ED visits, improvement with the escalation of therapy, the type of persisting symptoms, and vaccination status were obtained from both chart review and details from the patients during the scheduled office visit. Result(s): A total of 49 patients were studied. About 42 patients (82 %) had the alpha-variant infection before the vaccines were available. 28% (14 patients) of them had tested positive for infection more than once (i.e infection with alpha, delta, or omicron variant). About 38 (92.7%) of them reported having worsening of their baseline POTS symptoms during the active infection phase. About 28 patients (57 %) experienced worsening of their dysautonomia symptoms for at least 1-6 months post-infection. Nearly 30 patients (73.2%) required additional therapy for their symptom control and improvement. Conclusion(s): Of subjects with pre-existing POTS, most experienced a worsening of their baseline autonomic symptoms after suffering the COVID-19 infection which required additional pharmacotherapy for their symptom improvement. The majority of them had recovered within 6 months of therapy. From our observation, it is evident that the COVID-19 infection exacerbates the underlying symptoms in patients with established POTS disease.Copyright © 2023

Autonomic Dysfunction after Covid-19 Immunization - Case Report

Background: The infection caused by the SARS-CoV-2 continues affecting millions of people worldwide and vaccines to prevent the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) are considered the most promising approach for curbing the pandemic. Otherwise, cardiovascular and neurological complications associated with the vaccines were speculated and some few case reports were published. Objective(s): We describe a case of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) after viral vector COVID-19 vaccination and the possible autoimmune process of the syndrome. Method(s): A 35-year-old female, without previous symptoms or comorbidities, developed intermittent palpitation, intense fatigue and dyspnea, compromising her daily activities, triggered by upright position, seven days following the second dose of the Oxford vaccine. Physical examination was normal, except for a heart rate (HR) increase of 33 beats/min from supine to standing position, with no significant change in blood pressure and reproduction of symptoms. Result(s): A 24-hour Holter monitoring revealed episodes of spontaneous sinus tachycardia correlated with palpitation and fatigue. Extensive diagnostic investigations excluded primary cardiac, endocrine, infectious and rheumatologic etiologies. The patient underwent an autonomic function test which demonstrated normal baroreflex sensitivity, as well as normal cardiovagal and adrenergic scores. Head-up tilt test showed persistent orthostatic tachycardia (HR increase from a medium of 84 beats/min in supine position to 126 beats/min during upright tilt), without hypotension, consistent with the diagnostic criteria for POTS. According to the current guidelines, general behavior recommendations, pharmacotherapy with low dose of propranolol associated with the autonomic rehabilitation were oriented. Along three months of follow-up, the patient reported a gradually improvement in her symptoms. Conclusion(s): POTS is a heterogeneous disorder of the autonomic nervous system characterized by orthostatic tachycardia associated with symptoms of orthostatic intolerance. Although the physiopathology of COVID-19 vaccine and autonomic disorders remains speculative, autoimmune response is one of the possible mechanisms. Based on clinic presentation, the time frame of symptom onset is consistent with other well-known post-vaccination syndromes, which may be an indicator of an autoimmune process induced by immunization. Further studies are needed to assess causal relationship between immunization and autonomic dysfunction.Copyright © 2023

COVID-19 in Ultramarathon Runners: Findings of The Ultrarunner Longitudinal TRAcking Study

Purpose: Ultramarathon runners are a unique patient population who have been shown to be free of nearly all severe chronic medical conditions. The effect that COVID-19 infection has on this population and their running behavior is unknown. Method(s): The Ultrarunner Longitudinal TRACking Study (ULTRA Study) is the largest known longitudinal study of ultramarathon runners. Questions on general health status, running behavior, performance, and COVID-19 infection were included. Result(s): Six hundred sixty-two ultramarathon runners participated in the study. This group exercised an average of 10.0 hours per week, including running an average of 26.8 miles per week;52.1% of ultramarathon runners reported ever being symptomatic from a COVID-19 infection with 6.3% testing positive multiple times. Severe infection occurred in 0.3% (2 patients) requiring a total of 3 days of hospitalization. Of those who were infected, 84% were fully vaccinated at the time of their infection;67% of infections effected running for a mean of 33.1 days. The most common other symptoms included fever (73.3%), fatigue (68.7%), sore throat (67.5%), runny nose (67.0%), and cough (66.7%). Cardiovascular symptoms, which are of particular interest in the running population, included shortness of breath (46.4%), increased heart rate (45.2%), chest pain (34.2%), and wheezing (32.5%). Of 662, 48 (7.3%) of ultrarunners reported Long COVID (symptoms lasting more than 12 weeks). Conclusion(s): Severe COVID-19 infection is rare in ultramarathon runners, although symptomatic infection that affects running is common. These rates, along with Long COVID, are lower than is reported in the literature for the population on average. Significance: Ultrarunners are at very low risk of COVID- 19 symptoms requiring hospital care but significant risk of infection that effects running. Cardiovascular symptoms are common, and the long-term significance of these symptoms in runners is unknown.